Conquer Big Data with Database Sharding: A Comprehensive Guide to Scalability and Performance

You made an application, and now it is growing quite humongous each day. You face more active users and with more active users comes more information. The data is scaling to the point that it is becoming a little tiresome for you to handle all the incoming data. Forecasting the growth of your website or application can be a bit uncertain; therefore, companies prefer to scale their data dynamically using a certain database architecture. One such database architecture is the sharded database.

‍

In this guide, we will introduce the concept of Sharding in database architecture, how it works, the key concepts related to database sharding, and how you can choose the right strategy for your database.
‍

Introduction to Sharding

Why Sharding is Used and its Importance in database architecture

With the increasing volume of data in the database, it is hard to manage the data using a single database server. Applications in today’s age that are relevant to industries such as medicine, e-commerce, social media, and more have to store bulk data. If this data fails to be stored efficiently, it results in a website or application with degraded performance. 
‍

What is Sharding and How Does it Work?

Sharding is a database architectural pattern that is responsible for the distribution of a single data set among various other datasets. It is relevant to horizontal partitioning. Horizontal partitioning can be defined as dividing each row into separate tables. Each table is known to be a partition. In sharding, each data instance is called a  shard, which reduces the burden of the large data and improves the performance by distribution 
‍

The Concept of Sharding

In sharding, a single database is spread around various databases, which are then stored on different machines. Visually, it is seen in the following diagram, where a single database is divided into three chunks of smaller distributions.

The distribution will improve the total capacity of the system as the data can now be saved at multiple nodes, which enables them to handle more requests as compared to a single machine. Sharding is also termed horizontal scaling, where additional nodes are brought in to handle more load by the principle of distribution. This concept is also referred to as scaling out. This goes in contrast with vertical scaling which increases the power of a single database unit by improving its RAM and CPU.
‍

Understanding Shard Key and Range-based Sharding

Shard Key Definition

• Developers use the Shard key for the partitioning of the database
• In the dataset, a specific column dictates the grouping of data rows to create a shard.
• The developers may use a Shard key from a column that already exists or they may develop an entire Shard key
• A shard key has a greater cardinality, which corresponds to its unique values. The ease of even distribution increases due to greater cardinality 
  ‍

Range-based Sharding

Range-based sharding is one of the sharding techniques where the data is divided into continuous ranges depending on the value of the shard key. Every range gets allocated to a designated shard. This way, the data is managed with ease. However, it is crucial to choose the appropriate shard key, as it is the main entity that determines how the data is going to be distributed. To prevent hotspots, when a shard becomes overburdened with data or traffic, the key should be selected so that it distributes data evenly among all shards.

How Range-Based Sharding Works

Some of the steps of how the range sharding works are as follows.

• Choosing a Shard Key
• Defining the Ranges
• Assigning Ranges to Shards
• Query Handling
• Adding or Removing Shards

The working of the range-based sharding will be covered in detail later on in the article.
‍

Examples of Range-Based Sharding Implementation

Let us discuss some examples of range-based sharding.

• E-commerce Platform
• Social Media Platform
• Financial Transactions System

Let's discuss an example of an e-commerce platform in detail. The shard key will be the order ID. The orders are divided into ranges based on the IDs in the following way.

• Orders with IDs from 1 to 10,000 go to Shard 1.
• Orders with IDs from 10,001 to 20,000 go to Shard 2.
• Orders with IDs from 20,001 to 30,000 go to Shard 3.

The implementation is not only convenient but the queries for the order are efficiently directed to the dedicated shard, making it easier for more data to be stored.

Similarly for a social media platform like Facebook or Instagram, the shard key will be the user ID. The users will be divided based on their user IDs in the following way. 

• Users with IDs from 1 to 1,000,000 go to Shard A.
• Users with IDs from 1,000,001 to 2,000,000 go to Shard B.
• Users with IDs from 2,000,001 to 3,000,000 go to Shard C.

For a financial transaction system, the shard key can be the transaction date, where the transactions can be divided into ranges based on their dates in the following way.

• Transactions from January to March go to Shard Q1.
• Transactions from April to June go to Shard Q2.
• Transactions from July to September go to Shard Q3.
• Transactions from October to December go to Shard Q4.
  ‍

Benefits and Advantages of Sharding

Organizations use sharding to scale their data, which helps with effective load management. With enhanced read/write throughput, availability, and storage capacity, database sharding comes with several advantages. Some of them are described below.
‍

• Scalability and Performance

Through the addition of more shards, the computing power of the resource is greatly increased. As the queries are handled by the individual shards, the data retrieval and processing time are reduced significantly. With each shard handling its load, the performance of the application is greatly improved.
‍

• Reduced Latency and Improved Data Locality

Sharding improves data locality by enabling the geographic distribution of shards. This means that data can be stored closer to where it is most frequently accessed, Doing so not only improves the access times for users in different regions but also reduces the data locality in a significant way.

As the load is distributed across multiple shards, the read and write capability of the system is greatly improved, which improves its scalability. This improves data retrieval, which is quite significant in a single database. The response time is greatly improved as the data shards have fewer rows as compared to the database. As a result, querying or retrieving certain data from a shared database takes less time.
‍

• Fault Isolation Greater Availability 

In cases of maintenance, the application can remain active and there is no need to quit the application as the shards can be integrated into the system at runtime. This process is also known as fault isolation, where if one shard fails, the functionality of the other shards is not affected. This way the availability of the data is enhanced as well since each shard is a replication of another dataset meaning that the chances of data loss are less. Each replica proves to be a backup and the database will still be functional even if one of the shards stops functioning.
‍

• Cost Effective

Sharding offers a cost-effective scaling solution as compared to vertical scaling, which involves the addition of hardware like CPU and RAM, which can be costly. Horizontal scaling offers a pay-as-you-go model that limits the initial expenditure with the flexibility of increasing the number of shards over time, thus optimizing resource usage and expenditure on the database system.
‍

Types of Sharding Strategies

You need to know what sharding strategy best suits your application depending upon your requirements. Some of them are described as follows.

Range-based sharding

Range-based sharding distributes the shards based on range. The figure below explains the process of range-based sharding visually. The database stores information about the product price and its pricing category. The information about the products can be divided into three shards based on the pricing category.

Range-based sharing has a simple execution. Each individual shard holds unique data but they all come from the same database and have an identical makeup. The algorithm reads the range in which the data is to be written into the respective shard. However, the range-based sharding may face an unequal distribution. Even if all the shards hold the data in equal distribution, it is highly likely that more attention will be given to some of the shards.
‍

Directory-based Sharding 

A lookup table shall be made and regulated to implement directory-based sharding. It shall utilize a shard key to track the shards holding the data. A look-up table has values that are not changing and provides information about where the data is located. The visual representation of directory-based sharding looks like the following diagram.

In the above image, the department column represents the shard key. The lookup table contains the data that it gets from the shard key. Each shard should be written to a specified row. This approach is somewhat similar to range-based sharding. The only difference is that each key is attached to its particular value instead of defining a range for the shards. If the shard key has low cardinality, directory-based sharding should be preferred. Another factor that sets it apart from the key-based sharding is that the values are not plotted to the hash function. Directory-based sharding enables the user to use any algorithm for the assignment of data to the respective shards. This way the dynamic addition of the shards becomes convenient. It is the most flexible sharding approach but the requirement of integrating the lookup table before the execution of each write or query can negatively influence the performance of a website or application. If a lookup table gets corrupted, the ability to write new or existing data is affected which leads to the lookup table being a single point of failure. 
‍

Key Based Sharding (Hashed Sharding)

Key-based sharding is also called hashed sharding and algorithmic sharding. The system takes a record as input, which is then plugged into a hash function. The record can be a customer ID number, ZIP code, IP address, transaction amount, or any other user’s data. A hash function outputs a discrete value known as a hash value. The shard ID will be the hash value that finds out how the incoming data will be stored. The visual representation of the process of key-based sharding looks as follows.

‍

For a consistent data entry, the values entered plotted into the hash function should be from the same column. The column will act as a shard key which will be similar to a primary key. They act as a unique identifier for each specified row. Therefore, a shard key should not have values that change over time. If the values are dynamic, the workload for updating the operations will be increased which will eventually hamper performance. Therefore, it can create an issue when servers are to be added or removed. With the additional servers, each one will be assigned a new hash value, which will then be migrated to the right server. If the data is rebalanced, neither the new nor old hash functions. As a result, the application can go through downtime as the server will be unable to write data while the migration is being done. 
‍

In key-based sharding, the data is evenly distributed to prevent any hotspots. There is no need for a data map, as the data is distributed algorithmically. It is a necessity in other kinds of sharding such as directory base or range-based sharding.
‍

Geography Based Sharding

Geography-based sharding, also known as geo-sharding, ties the data together on a single shard. What makes geo-sharding unique is that the data is relevant to the geography where the shards are geo-located. Let’s consider a dataset that has a country field. This way the system's performance is increased with reduced system latency as a shard is created for each region. The latency is reduced as the data is kept closer to the users and distributed across regions, improving availability and fault tolerance. 

‍

Here is a pseudo-code that explains how a database system can handle the data insertion through geo-sharding.

def get_region(user_location):
    if user_location in ['USA', 'Canada', 'Mexico']:
        return 'NA'
    elif user_location in ['Germany', 'France', 'UK']:
        return 'EU'
    elif user_location in ['Japan', 'China', 'India']:
        return 'AS'
    else:
        return 'NA'  # Default to NA for simplicity

def insert_user(user):
    region = get_region(user['location'])
    shard = connect_to_shard(region)
    shard.insert('users', user)

def insert_order(order):
    region = get_region(order['user_location'])
    shard = connect_to_shard(region)
    shard.insert('orders', order)

# Example usage
user = {'name': 'John Doe', 'location': 'USA'}
order = {'order_id': 123, 'user_location': 'USA', 'item': 'Laptop'}

insert_user(user)
insert_order(order)

‍

In the above code,

• get_region(user_location): Determines the region based on the user's location, returning 'NA', 'EU', or 'AS'.
• insert_user(user): Gets the region of the user, connects to the appropriate shard, and inserts the user.
• insert_order(order): Gets the region of the order, connects to the appropriate shard, and inserts the order.
• Example Usage: Insert a user and an order with locations in the USA into the respective shards.

‍

Implementing Sharding in Different Database Systems 

The implementation of sharding varies in SQL and NoSQL databases because of their various architectures and use cases. They often require additional components, like middleware, that are used for the purpose of routing queries to the required shard to make sure that the data is consistent and distributed across each shard.

‍

Let us discuss their implementation in detail.

Sharding in SQL Databases 

In SQL databases, sharding is done through horizontal partitioning. The rows of the table are divided into numerous database instances. The process can get complicated because the requirement is that the SQL databases should maintain  ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties. Here is an example of how the range-based sharding is implemented in SQL.
‍

-- Create Shards
CREATE DATABASE shard1;
CREATE DATABASE shard2;

-- Create Tables in Each Shard
CREATE TABLE shard1.users (
    id INT PRIMARY KEY,
    name VARCHAR(100)
);

CREATE TABLE shard2.users (
    id INT PRIMARY KEY,
    name VARCHAR(100)
);

‍

In the above code,

• Two databases, shard1 and shard2, are created.
• Identical user tables with id and name columns are created in both shards.
• Data insertion is based on specific criteria, such as ID range.
• Alice with ID 1 is inserted into shard1.users.
• Bob with ID 101 is inserted into shard2.user

Similarly, hash-based sharding can be implemented in a similar way.

-- Hash Function to Determine Shard

CREATE FUNCTION get_shard(user_id INT) RETURNS INT DETERMINISTIC
BEGIN
    RETURN user_id % 2;
END;

SET @user_id = 123;
SET @name = 'Charlie';
SET @shard = get_shard(@user_id);

IF @shard = 0 THEN
    INSERT INTO shard1.users (id, name) VALUES (@user_id, @name);
ELSE
    INSERT INTO shard2.users (id, name) VALUES (@user_id, @name);
END IF;

‍

In the above code,

• Shard Determination Function: The `get_shard` function calculates which shard (database partition) to use based on the `user_id` by returning the remainder when `user_id` is divided by 2.
• Variable Initialization: The script sets `@user_id` to 123 and `@name` to 'Charlie', preparing the values for insertion into the appropriate shard.
• Shard Calculation: The script uses the `get_shard` function to determine the shard for `@user_id`, storing the result in `@shard`.
• Conditional Insertion: Based on the value of `@shard`, the script inserts the user data into either `shard1.users` (if `@shard` is 0) or `shard2.users` (if `@shard` is 1).
• Data Distribution: The code effectively distributes user data across two shards, ensuring balanced storage by using the modulo operation on `user_id`.
  ‍

Sharding Strategies and Implementation in NoSQL Databases

NoSQL databases are designed for horizontal partitioning and are highly available. Sharding is implemented with the help of a key-value distribution method. A key is a unique identifier that serves as the basis for the distribution of data. Some of the common sharding strategies in NoSQL databases include consistent hashing. Consistent hashing distributes the data in an efficient manner across several nodes. This ensures that the data is evenly distributed and balanced automatically when the nodes are added or removed. Some of the NoSQL databases MongoDB and Cassandra provide support for the sharding making it easier to implement the sharding. A snippet for the implementation of the sharding in MongoDB is given below.

// Enable Sharding on the Database
sh.enableSharding("myDatabase");

// Shard a Collection Using a Shard Key

sh.shardCollection("myDatabase.myCollection", { user_id: 1 });

db.myCollection.insert({ user_id: 1, name: "Alice" });
db.myCollection.insert({ user_id: 101, name: "Bob" });

In the above code,

• Enable Sharding: sh.enableSharding("myDatabase"); activates sharding for the myDatabase.
• Shard Collection: sh.shardCollection("myDatabase.myCollection", { user_id: 1 }); shreds myCollection in myDatabase using user_id as the shard key.
• Insert Document 1: db.myCollection.insert({ user_id: 1, name: "Alice" }); adds a document with user_id: 1 to the sharded collection.
• Insert Document 2: db.myCollection.insert({ user_id: 101, name: "Bob" }); adds a document with user_id: 101 to the sharded collection.
• Data Distribution: Documents are distributed across shards based on their user_id values.

An example code snippet of Sharding in Cassandra is given below.

-- Create a Keyspace with NetworkTopologyStrategy
CREATE KEYSPACE myKeyspace WITH REPLICATION = {
    'class': 'NetworkTopologyStrategy',
    'datacenter1': 3
};

-- Create a Table with a Partition Key
CREATE TABLE myKeyspace.users (
    user_id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
    name TEXT
);

-- Insert Data into Table
INSERT INTO myKeyspace.users (user_id, name) VALUES (uuid(), 'Alice');
INSERT INTO myKeyspace.users (user_id, name) VALUES (uuid(), 'Bob');

In the above code,

• Create Keyspace: Defines myKeyspace with NetworkTopologyStrategy and 3 replicas in datacenter1.
• Create Table: Establishes users table in myKeyspace with user_id (UUID) as the primary key and name as a text field.
• Insert Record 1: Adds a user with a generated UUID and the name 'Alice' to the user's table.
• Insert Record 2: Adds a user with a generated UUID and the name 'Bob' to the user's table.
• Replication Setup: Ensures data is replicated 3 times within datacenter1 for fault tolerance.
  ‍

Case Studies and Examples

Real World Examples

• eBay is a major e-commerce platform that utilizes MongoDB for the management of the product catalog and customer data. eBay implements sharing for the effective distribution of the load through several servers. Using the Sharding approach, the search suggestions are fast while managing high transaction volumes.
• MetLife utilizes MongoDB to power "The Wall," a customer support application that unifies information from 70 different legacy systems into a single perspective. MetLife can now manage 24 terabytes of data over six servers thanks to sharding, which enhances data management and customer service effectiveness.
• Shutterfly is an online photo-sharing platform that uses MongoDB for the management of 6 billion images. Previously, it used Oracle for the management of the data. Due to sharding in MongoDB, Shutterfly can efficiently handle up to 10,000 operations in a second, which enhances the scalability and performance of the platform.
• F6 Automobile Technology focuses on the automotive market and uses the concept of sharding to manage its massive datasets. It manages the data by using the client ID as a sharding key. Doing so enables efficient data management across multiple servers by improving data isolation and query performance.
• The Weather Channel uses MongoDB, which stores and analyzes real-time weather data and, with that, provides accurate and updated forecasts. The high data volume is handled efficiently 
  ‍

Comparing Sharding with Partitioning

Handling larger datasets in an application or a website requires several strategies. Two of these strategies are called sharding and partitioning. They may sound alike but have individualized benefits and some key differences.

‍

Let us compare the sharding and partitioning in detail.

‍

Sharding is a database architecture that mainly uses horizontal partitioning across various servers. Separate shards hold the data and are considered completely independent. The data is distributed on the basis of a unique shard key which can be the client ID, geographic location, and more. Distributing the load into different shards improves the performance and reduces the load on each database. Let’s consider an example of sharding in a social media platform that always experiences heavy traffic and high data volumes. The data is distributed into different shards on the basis of user ID ranges such as 0-1000, 1001-2000, 2001-3000, etc.

‍

Let’s consider the following example where each shard operates independently and works on the principle of horizontal scaling. Each shard consists of a range of user IDs, for instance, users_0_1000, users_1001_2000, users_2001_3000, and operated independently. The shards are set up in the following way. 

-- Create a new database shard for users with IDs 0-1000
CREATE DATABASE users_0_1000;

-- Create a new database shard for users with IDs 1001-2000
CREATE DATABASE users_1001_2000;

-- Create a new database shard for users with IDs 2001-3000
CREATE DATABASE users_2001_3000;

‍

Next, the data is inserted which is managed by the application logic that directs the user data to the right shard depending upon the user ID.

-- Insert data into the appropriate shard based on user ID
USE users_0_1000;
INSERT INTO user_data (user_id, user_name, user_info) VALUES (1, 'Alice', 'Info about Alice');

USE users_1001_2000;
INSERT INTO user_data (user_id, user_name, user_info) VALUES (1500, 'Bob', 'Info about Bob');

USE users_2001_3000;
INSERT INTO user_data (user_id, user_name, user_info) VALUES (2500, 'Charlie', 'Info about Charlie');

‍

Finally, the queries are routed to the correct shard based on the user ID. The logic of the application identifies the shard and successfully executes the query.

-- Query data from the appropriate shard based on user ID
USE users_0_1000;
SELECT * FROM user_data WHERE user_id = 1;

USE users_1001_2000;
SELECT * FROM user_data WHERE user_id = 1500;

USE users_2001_3000;
SELECT * FROM user_data WHERE user_id = 2500;

‍

Partitioning on the other hand is the process by which the database is divided into different partitions that are stored and managed independently. This is usually referred to as vertical partitioning. The division happens within a database system which removes the need for division across multiple servers. Partitioning is executed to improve the performance of larger datasets by dividing the data into small manageable systems that can streamline the operations and improve the query performance.

‍

For the creation of a partitioned table that is used for storing the transaction records and partitioning them by the months, the following code snippet can be used. The following example showcases how the table can be divided into partitions depending on the month of the transaction date.

CREATE TABLE transactions (
    transaction_id INT NOT NULL,
    user_id INT NOT NULL,
    transaction_date DATE NOT NULL,
    amount DECIMAL(10,2) NOT NULL
) PARTITION BY RANGE (MONTH(transaction_date)) (
    PARTITION p_jan VALUES LESS THAN (2),
    PARTITION p_feb VALUES LESS THAN (3),
    PARTITION p_mar VALUES LESS THAN (4),
    PARTITION p_apr VALUES LESS THAN (5),
    PARTITION p_may VALUES LESS THAN (6),
    PARTITION p_jun VALUES LESS THAN (7),
    PARTITION p_jul VALUES LESS THAN (8),
    PARTITION p_aug VALUES LESS THAN (9),
    PARTITION p_sep VALUES LESS THAN (10),
    PARTITION p_oct VALUES LESS THAN (11),
    PARTITION p_nov VALUES LESS THAN (12),
    PARTITION p_dec VALUES LESS THAN (13)
);

‍

In the above code,

• Table Creation: The transactions table includes columns for transaction_id, user_id, transaction_date, and amount.
• Partitioning Strategy: The table is partitioned by the month of the transaction_date using the RANGE partitioning method.
• Partitions:
• p_jan: Contains records of transactions in January.
• p_feb: Contains records of transactions in February.
• p_mar: Contains records of transactions in March.
• p_apr: Contains records of transactions in April.
• p_may: Contains records of transactions in May.
• p_jun: Contains records of transactions in June.
• p_jul: Contains records of transactions in July.
• p_aug: Contains records of transactions in August.
• p_sep: Contains records of transactions in September.
• p_oct: Contains records of transactions in October.
• p_nov: Contains records of transactions in November.
• p_dec: Contains records of transactions in December.

The structure has different partitions, such as p_jan, p_feb, p_mar, etc., that function as a subset of the table. This way, the data is managed efficiently and queries are routed quickly as the amount of data scanned for each partition is reduced. This way, the data is well organized and can be conveniently queried depending on the month.
‍

Advantages and Disadvantages of Sharding

Using sharding has the following advantages.

• Improved Scalability: Sharding improves scalability by enabling horizontal scaling. This allows for the addition of more servers that can distribute the load.
• Improved Performance: The read and write operations are distributed across multiple servers, which improves the performance of the application, particularly for applications that require more reading operations.
• High Availability and Fault Tolerance: Each shard works in an independent manner which greatly enhances the reliability and fault tolerance. This is because if one shard is not functional, the system is still intact and the other shards are operational.
• Load Balancing: The load is distributed evenly throughout the entire system reducing the possibility for any individual node to become the blockage point for the entire system.
• Data Isolation: Through data isolation, individual shards are allocated for various tenants that improve both the security and functionality of the performance.

The disadvantages of the sharding are described below.

• Functional Complexity: It may be a little complex to operate sharding due to several databases requiring more complex infrastructure, monitoring strategies, and maintenance.
• Cross-Shard Queries: Handling multiple shard queries may be slower and more difficult due to increased latency and network overhead.
• Data Distribution Challenges: Choosing an effective sharding key and achieving even data distribution can be quite challenging resulting in an imbalanced load and reduced performance.
• Application Changes: The development time and costs for the implementation of sharding are greatly increased requiring substantial modifications.
• Data Consistency: It is difficult to maintain consistency across shards in contexts where transactional consistency is important.
  ‍

Advantages and Disadvantages of Partitioning

Some of the advantages of partitioning are described below.

• Easy to Maintain: Partitioning is easy to maintain as it enables operations such as schema changes, backups, or data purges to execute in an efficient manner. The segmentation is limited to a relevant partition that has no effect on the other database.
• Improved Performance for Particular Workloads: Partitioning is better for certain workloads especially those that involve a greater amount of historical data such as historical financial data for any organization. Certain queries target particular transitions that execute efficiently as the dataset size is now reduced making the partitioning perfect for logs, time series data, or anywhere where the analysis is not limited to the particular time frames.
• Simpler Implementation: Partitioning has a simpler implementation as compared to sharding as it only involves the addition of hardware for enhancing the database management in a single unit.
• Improved Query Performance: The data is separated into partitions which improves the query performance 

The disadvantages of partitioning are described as follows.

• Complicated Data Management: While it is easier to maintain data in particular situations, it may introduce complexity in some situations. A deeper comprehension of the data partitioning patterns is required. If the partitioning is not correct, the data can be skewed leading to one partition being greater than another one. The inconsistency in the data negatively affects the performance of the database. 
• Single Point of Failure: Partitioning happens with a similar database instance 
• Resource Contention:
• Query Performance Overhead:

Key Architectural Differences Between Sharding and Partitioning

A major difference between sharding and partitioning is how the data is distributed. In partitioning, the data is distributed within a single database instance while in sharding, the data is distributed across multiple databases. Sharding scales in a horizontal manner with the addition of more shards however partitioning scales vertically by adding more resources to the same database instance. Partitioning handles a single database instance while sharding handles multiple database instances. Normally sharding is implemented for the distribution of load across a cluster for greater scalability and partitioning is used for improved data management and optimization within a database.
‍

Impact on Performance and Management 

Sharding distributes the load across multiple servers improving the performance by reducing the contention. However, the cross-shard queries can be a bit complicated to handle. Partitioning can improve the performance of specified queries by reducing the amount of data scanned. However, it may suffer from resource contention due to a greater load. 

Sharding has a more complex management as multiple database instances are managed. Sharding requires careful monitoring of shard distribution, balancing, and cross-shard operations. Partitioning on the other hand is easier to manage since all partitions are within a single database instance. Maintenance tasks are straightforward, though they can be constrained by the risk of having a single point of failure.
‍

Choosing the Right Sharding Strategy for Your Database

When managing your database, it is important to choose the right strategy for effective database management. 
‍

Factors to Consider

Here are some of the factors and best practices that you may consider when choosing the right strategy for your database.

Performance Requirements

For better performance, one should consider query speed and latency tolerance. Consider the types of queries the application will be running and how implementing the sharding technique can have an impact on the performance of the database. Moreover, determine the maximum latency your application can tolerate, as sharding may increase latency because of cross-shard communication.
‍

Data Distribution

Make sure that the data is evenly spread so that the load is not on a single shard. Consider the design access patterns and see if you can distribute the data in a manner that reduces the need for cross-shard queries. Pick a strategy that best suits the way your application reads versus writes data.
‍

Scalability Considerations

Make sure that the sharding strategy lets you add the new shards in a convenient manner as your data grows. Make sure that you design your sharding strategy in a way that it handles the fault well and there is no single point of failure. Instead, the shards are readily available. Make sure that you plan ahead to handle future data growth to prevent the need for any major reconfigurations later.
‍

Best Practices

Some of the best practices to consider while sharding are described below.

• Using an appropriate sharding key that is unique for the even distribution of data
• Regularly analyze the performance of the shard and regulate it through automated tools for a balanced distribution of traffic across the shards
• Start with a simpler implementation and have a plan already for the re-sharding as your data grows. Try using effective data migration tools and techniques for transferring data between shards without affecting performance
• Verify that the sharding technique satisfies performance and reliability requirements by conducting comprehensive testing under simulated production loads.
• Make sure that the shard keys are properly indexed for better query performance
• Keep detailed documentation of your sharding strategy, configuration, and operational procedures.
  ‍

Conclusion 

The above guide covers in detail the concept of sharding, its different types, and its use cases. It also discussed how sharding differs from partitioning and gave a holistic view of each architectural type related to sharding. Additionally, the guide highlights the importance of starting with a simple sharding strategy, using proven technologies, focusing on consistency, and maintaining detailed documentation. By following this guide, you can implement a sharding strategy that enhances your database's performance and scalability, ultimately supporting the growth and success of your application.